Eastern Front #8 Hitler’s Summer Triumph Turns Bitter

 

Last time we spoke about the Fall of Smolensk. The Wehrmacht, having swiftly advanced through the Soviet Union, aimed to open the path to Moscow. Under General Fedor von Bock, the Germans launched a major assault against Soviet defenses, led by Marshal Semyon Timoshenko. Despite early successes, German forces underestimated the resilience of the Soviet Army, which regrouped and mobilized hidden reserves. As the Luftwaffe dominated the skies, the Soviets, under General Vasily Vatutin, organized a counteroffensive. On July 15, intense combat erupted in Smolensk, with German troops steadily encircling the city. The Red Army, despite suffering heavy losses, showcased determination by relocating factories eastward and outproducing their enemies in tanks and aircraft. By July 16, Smolensk fell to the Germans, yet the battle revealed underlying vulnerabilities in the Wehrmacht. The fierce resistance from Soviet soldiers hinted at a critical turning point in the war. 

This episode is the Hitler’s Summer Triumph Turns Bitter

Well hello there, welcome to the Eastern Front week by week podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about world war two? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on world war two and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel you can find a few videos all the way from the Opium Wars of the 1800’s until the end of the Pacific War in 1945. 

As July 1941 draws to a close, the Eastern Front plunges into a harrowing new chapter, characterized by escalating brutality, adaptive strategies, and profound exhaustion. Amidst this chaos, the Red Army grapples with staggering losses. Yet, while they are battered, they also begin to exhibit a remarkable capacity for strategic learning and resilience under relentless fire. Often overshadowed in discussions of the Eastern campaign, naval operations emerge as a crucial element in this conflict, unfolding across vital waterways such as the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and even the Arctic. These operations highlight the expansive and interconnected stakes of this monumental struggle. Key developments during this period include significant reorganizations within Soviet command, intense encirclement battles in Ukraine, and renewed offensives around the city of Smolensk, a strategically important location approximately 400 kilometers west of Moscow. Smolensk's position makes it a critical hub for transport and supply in the region, influencing the broader course of the war. As the fighting intensifies, the outcome of this encounter hangs in the balance. Both the Axis and Soviet forces are faced with mounting challenges amidst the chaotic escalation of warfare. 

The Eastern Front during World War II was predominantly a land and air conflict, a reality shaped largely by the vast and varied geography of the Soviet Union. The Luftwaffe was assigned a critical dual role in the Eastern Front: to establish complete control over the airspace by decimating the Soviet air force and to provide essential ground support for the army’s main operations. In the initial phase of the campaign, long-range air attacks targeting industrial centers in the distant Ural Mountains would not be prioritized; instead, these operations were planned to follow the completion of the mobile offensives. While it is commonly believed that Germany's navy, the Kriegsmarine, played a minimal role in the Eastern Front campaigns, this perception overlooks the nuanced involvement of naval forces. While the Kriegsmarine was a large, powerful, and professional force, its effectiveness was hampered by the need to divide its assets across multiple theaters of war. This limitation significantly restricted the number and size of ships that could be deployed in the Baltic Sea, particularly as the conflict intensified. At the onset of Operation Barbarossa on June 21, 1941, the German naval forces operating in the Baltic Sea comprised a modest yet effective fleet, including: 28 Schnellboote “fast attack boats”,5 submarines, 10 minelayers, primarily converted from passenger liners and ferries, 3 squadrons of M-class minesweepers, 3 squadrons of requisitioned minesweepers, which were often trawlers, 2 squadrons of R-boats “light coastal defense craft”, 2 squadrons of patrol boats, typically made up of trawlers, 3 Sperrbrecher “block ships designed to create obstacles”, 2 depot ships for minesweepers, a variety of naval tugs, transports, and auxiliary vessels. Later on in September 1941, Germany established the provisional Baltenflotte, a naval task force designed to confront the Soviet Baltic Fleet. This flotilla boasted impressive assets, including the battleship Tirpitz and several cruisers: Admiral Scheer, Emden, Köln, Leipzig, and Nürnberg, as well as destroyers Z25, Z26, and Z27, along with the 2nd torpedo boat squadron. The primary mission of the Baltenflotte was to eliminate the Soviet Baltic Fleet if it attempted to escape to neutral Sweden. However, this scenario did not materialize. Aerial reconnaissance indicated extensive damage to the remaining vessels of the Soviet Baltic Fleet, leading to the disbandment of the Baltenflotte before the end of October 1941.

Germany’s ally in the Baltic Sea was the Finnish Navy and while small, was a professional force equipped to meet the demands of its strategic objectives during the conflict. In 1941, Finland's naval strength comprised the following key assets: Two coastal defense ships: Ilmarinen and Väinämöinen, which provided essential firepower and protection for Finland's coastline. Five submarines: Vesihiisi, Iku-Turso, Vetehinen, Vesikko, and Saukko, which played a vital role in disrupting enemy shipping and gathering intelligence. Four sloops: Turunmaa, Karjala, Uusimaa, and Hämeenmaa, tasked with various missions, including escort and minesweeping operations. Three minelayers: These ships were crucial for establishing minefields in strategic areas to impede enemy movement. Twelve minesweepers: Essential for clearing navigable waters, allowing safe passage for friendly vessels.Seven motor torpedo boats: Fast and agile, these boats were capable of launching surprise attacks against larger enemy ships. In addition to these primary vessels, the Finnish Navy also utilized several auxiliary craft, enhancing its operational capabilities during the war. Notable among these were: Four sloops: Reassigned mainly as escorts and minesweepers, further expanding the Navy’s capacity for coastal defense. Six cutters: Smaller vessels employed for escort duties and minesweeping operations, demonstrating versatility in combat situations. Seventeen VMV-class patrol boats: These small vessels served multiple roles, acting as torpedo boats, gunboats, and sub-hunters, showcasing their adaptability on the water.

Their enemy was the Soviet Baltic Fleet, commanded by Admiral Vladimir Tributs throughout World War II, was the largest of the four fleets that comprised the Soviet Navy. Initially, the fleet was limited to bases in the eastern corner of the Gulf of Finland, but it quickly emerged as the most formidable naval power in the Baltic Sea. As the war unfolded, the fleet expanded its operational capabilities by utilizing naval bases in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. This expansion began with agreements imposed by the Soviet Union in the autumn of 1939 and was solidified following the occupation of the Baltic states in June 1940. Additionally, the Soviet Baltic Fleet benefited from territorial gains made in the peace treaty after the Winter War, acquiring valuable naval assets, including a base at Hanko, Finland, and access along the coast of the Karelian Isthmus. Prior to Operation Barbarossa, the main naval bases of the Baltic Fleet were located at Liepāja and Tallinn. As of June 1941, the Soviet Naval strength in the Baltic included a diverse array of vessels: Battleships: 2 (Gangut class), Cruisers: 2 (Kirov class), Destroyer leaders: 2 (Leningrad class), Modern destroyers: 17 (comprising 3 Type 7, 13 Type 7U, and Opytny), Older destroyers: 7 (including 2 Izyaslav-class and 4 Orfey-class, plus the Yakov Sverdlov), Submarines: 65, Escort vessels/gunboats: 7, Mine warfare vessels: 39, Motor torpedo boats: 48, Despite these assets, the fleet faced increasing challenges as German forces advanced, which would soon impact its operational effectiveness in the region.

The Winter War, along with the occupation of the Baltic states, had positioned the Red Banner Baltic Fleet robustly within the region. By June 1941, it was the largest navy on the Baltic Sea, boasting two battleships, two heavy cruisers, 19 destroyers, and 68 submarines, supported by a naval air arm of 709 aircraft. With well-established bases along the entire Baltic coast and in Hanko, the fleet posed a significant threat, particularly as the long and vulnerable southern coast of Finland became exposed to Soviet naval presence. The Finnish Navy consisted of two main branches: the first included the old but well-maintained coastal fortifications built by the Russians before World War I, known as Peter the Great's Naval Fortress; the second was the active navy, featuring two coastal defense ships, five submarines, and various smaller craft. However, the Kriegsmarine could only deploy a small portion of its naval forces in the Baltic, as the majority were engaged in the ongoing battle of the Atlantic. Germany's primary concern in the Baltic Sea was to safeguard the supply routes through the Archipelago Sea that were vital for importing iron ore from Sweden to support its war industry. 

The Nazi invaders strategically leveraged the strengths of their military, a framework deeply influenced by decisions made in the two decades leading up to the war. Despite this, naval aviation was largely neglected, and the concept of constructing a formidable navy to counter a Soviet threat was dismissed. Instead, the Kriegsmarine’s planners primarily focused on countering the Royal Navy, withome attention given to the French Navy. Consequently, the German navy was ill-equipped to provide substantial support in the Eastern campaign. However, this does not imply that the Kriegsmarine was entirely absent from the conflict. For instance, logistical planning for Army Group North included provisions for transport by ship, primarily from the Prussian coastline. After the capture of Riga, located on the southeastern shore of the Baltic Sea, in early July, this city became a vital logistical hub. Its strategic position enabled the timely movement of troops and supplies, which were essential for sustaining the German advance deeper into Soviet territory.  When the Germans launched their surprise assault on the USSR on June 22, 1941, the Soviet Navy was caught off guard and suffered substantial losses during its withdrawal from the Baltic States and Finland. The Kriegsmarine had strategically begun laying mines several hours prior to the formal invasion, which quickly resulted in the loss of a Soviet destroyer to mines on the second day of the conflict. The swift German advance compelled the Soviet Navy to abandon its coastal bases and retreat towards Tallinn and Kronstadt, severely diminishing its operational capacity in the Baltic Sea.

By mid-July 1941, the Baltic Sea had become effectively a German-controlled body of water. To the south, Denmark and Norway were occupied by German troops, while Sweden maintained a stance of neutrality. Meanwhile, Finland was engaged in active combat against the Soviets, further isolating the Red Navy. With such limited maneuverability, the Soviet Baltic Sea Fleet found itself in a precarious position. Though the Germans had lost the battleship Bismarck in May, and the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen was temporarily sidelined after sustaining bomb damage in Brest later that month, they still maintained naval superiority. The formidable battleship Tirpitz, more powerful than anything the Red Navy could field, was expressly assigned to deter any potential actions from the Soviet fleet. As the situation deteriorated for the Soviets, the Baltic Fleet was soon forced into a defensive posture, effectively mining itself into their bases at Kronstadt and Leningrad. This entrapment only heightened the desperation of the Red Navy, restricting their ability to respond to the rapid German advances. As we unravel the intricate dynamics of naval power in this conflict, it becomes clear how critical control of the Baltic Sea was to the overall objectives of both the Axis and Soviet forces.

Meanwhile the Black sea was quite a different story. It was far more open than the Baltic, offering the Red Navy more room to operate more freely. However the Black sea also had a plethora of naval powers in it, many of which were Axis members. Overall for the axis, Romania had 4 destroyers, 4 torpedo boats, 3 minelayers, 3 gunboats, 1 submarine tender, 8 submarines. Germany: 16 torpedo boats, 6 submarines, over 100 landing craft, focused on protecting supply routes. Italy: 7+ torpedo boats, 6 submarines. Bulgaria: 11 torpedo boats, 5 anti-submarine craft, involved in escort duties. Croatia: 12 anti-submarine craft. The Soviet black Fleet was significantly stronger, comprising: 1 battleship: Parizhskaya Kommuna, 6 cruisers: Including Molotov and Voroshilov, Destroyer leaders: 3 Kharkov, Moskva, and Tashkent, Modern destroyers: 11, Older destroyers: 5, Small multipurpose vessels: 15, 44 submarines: A substantial underwater fleet, Motor torpedo boats: 84. 

On June 26, 1941, Soviet forces launched an audacious attack on Constanța, a strategic port city located on the western coast of the Black Sea in Romania. This operation was marked by significant naval engagements. The Soviet destroyer leader Moskva tragically met its fate, striking mines while skillfully evading intense fire from Axis coastal artillery and destroyers lurking in the region. Throughout the conflict, the Soviet Black Sea Fleet played a vital role, particularly in its efforts to support the besieged garrison in Odessa, another essential port city to the northwest of Constanța. As the summer waned into October, the fleet managed to evacuate a staggering number of personnel, including approximately 86,000 soldiers and 150,000 civilians. However, this miraculous operation came at a cost, with the loss of the destroyer Frunze and a gunboat, both succumbing to German dive bombers during the evacuation process. The tragedy intensified on November 7, when the Soviet hospital ship Armenia was bombed and sunk by German aircraft, leading to the heartbreaking loss of over 5,000 lives, most of whom were civilians and patients desperate to escape the escalating conflict. As the battle for control in the region intensified, the Black Sea Fleet proved instrumental in mounting a formidable defense of Sevastopol, a critical naval base located on the Crimean Peninsula. In December of 1941, a daring amphibious operation was launched against the nearby Kerch Peninsula, resulting in the recapture of this strategically important landform. This operation was bolstered by a naval detachment that included the cruiser Krasnyi Krym, which remained in Sevastopol to provide critical gunfire support against incoming enemy forces.

Soviet submarines extended their reach, executing successful raids against Axis shipping along the coasts of Romania and Bulgaria, sinking approximately 29,000 long tons of enemy vessels. This period also saw both the Soviet and Axis forces laying extensive minefields in the Southern Black Sea. Notably, Romanian defensive minefields accounted for the sinking of at least five Soviet submarines, specifically M-58, S-34, ShCh-211, M-34, and M-59. In the tumult of this naval warfare, the Axis forces also faced setbacks. The Romanian minelayer Regele Carol I was lost to a mine laid by the Soviet submarine L-4. Ironically, two of the five Soviet submarines that had perished in previous minefield encounters ultimately met their end in the very fields that followed the sinking of this minelayer. In total, until the end of the war, Romanian defensive minefields claimed the lives of up to 15 Soviet submarines. Additionally, the Romanian navy suffered its own losses, including the minelayer Aurora, which was destroyed by Soviet bombers on July 15, further escalating the tensions and losses experienced by both sides in this fierce arena of WW2.

The last naval theater relevant to the Eastern Front was the arctic ocean. In response to the escalating threat posed by the Axis, Britain and the Soviet Union forged a crucial alliance through the Anglo-Soviet Agreement in July of that year. Recognizing the urgency of the situation, Britain swiftly began to provide significant material aid to the USSR starting in August. This support included essential supplies such as tanks and aircraft, all aimed at bolstering their new ally’s capacity to resist the relentless advance of the Axis forces. A primary route for this vital supply effort was through Iran, where both nations collaborated as part of a joint occupation beginning in late August. This maneuver was crucial to neutralize German influence in the region, which could potentially threaten Allied interests. 

The importance of the Allied cooperation was further underscored when, in September, the Soviet Union participated in the Second Inter-Allied Conference in London. This event symbolized the USSR's emergence as one of the "Big Three" Allies in World War II, alongside Britain and, from December onward, the United States. These three nations would unite their efforts in a concerted fight against the Axis Powers, fundamentally altering the course of the war. Additionally, a key component of this alliance was the American Lend-Lease program, which was signed into law in March 1941. This program provided both Britain and the Soviet Union with critical war matériel starting in October of that same year. As the war progressed, Lend-Lease scaled up significantly during 1943, supplying the Allies with the resources necessary to sustain their war effort. In reciprocation, the British Empire, along with the Soviet Union, albeit on a smaller scale, implemented a Reverse Lend-Lease program, which allowed them to provide aid and resources back to the United States. This mutual support among the Allies showcased the collaborative spirit that was essential for overcoming the formidable challenges posed by the Axis Powers.

On June 25, 1941, the Soviet troopship Mossovet arrived at Titovka, delivering much-needed reinforcements to bolster the Soviet defenses in the face of the advancing Axis forces. Just five days later, on June 30, Soviet destroyers Kuibishev and Uritski also landed additional troops, highlighting the urgency of the situation as the war intensified. Moving into July, the German U-boats began to establish their presence in the Arctic. On July 1, U-451 and U-652 were the first submarines to be stationed in these frigid waters, poised for operations that would challenge Soviet shipping and naval activity. On July 12, the Kriegsmarine escalated its aggressive tactics. A flotilla of destroyers comprising Richard Beitzen, Hermann Schoemann, Hans Lody, Friedrich Eckoldt, and Karl Galster launched a surprise attack on a small Soviet convoy near Cape Teriberski, further showcasing the increasing tension in this vital maritime region. Two days later, on July 14, a counteraction by Soviet naval forces was initiated. Destroyers Gromky, Gremyashchy, Stremitleny, and Kuibishev engaged the enemy, successfully delaying a German infantry advance near the Zapadnaya Litsa River, which runs through the Murmansk region of Russia. This timely intervention helped to buy precious time for the Soviet ground forces. Tragically, on July 20, the Soviet destroyer Stremitleny met a grim fate in Kola Bay, where it was sunk by a German Junkers Ju 87 dive bomber. This event signified the growing air threat that the Soviets faced as their naval operations continued.

The situation worsened for the Soviet fleet on July 23, when Kriegsmarine destroyers—Richard Beitzen, Hermann Schoemann, Friedrich Eckoldt, and Karl Galster, successfully sank the Soviet survey ship Meridian near Teriberka, a small fishing village along the Arctic coast. In a bold move, British naval forces were instrumental in the escalating air conflict. On July 30, aircraft from HMS Furious and Victorious launched airstrikes on the strategic ports of Petsamo and Kirkenes, located in northeastern Norway near the border with Russia. The following day, on July 31, HMS Victorious conducted an airstrike on Tromsø, turning back a German patrol of destroyers. Further demonstrating their operational capabilities, British warships including HMS Nigeria, Aurora, Punjabi, and Tartar destroyed a weather station on Bear Island, a small, remote island located between Norway and Svalbard. These actions underscored the multifaceted naval warfare that characterized the summer of 1941, as both the Axis and Allied forces vied for control in regions crucial to their strategic objectives.

Army Group North found itself in a precarious position following a series of setbacks, particularly after the confident maneuvers of General Erich von Manstein had led his Panzer Corps to suffer heavy losses at Soltsy. Nevertheless, despite these challenges, Manstein had managed to preserve his divisions, and the situation had not yet tilted decisively against Army Group North. Field Marshal Wilhelm von Leeb, commanding the group, retained a strong force and was poised to continue his advance toward the strategic city of Leningrad. However, Leeb knew it was crucial to pause and reassess his forces. In the last few weeks, Army Group North had pushed forward nearly six hundred kilometers, yet they still found themselves over a hundred kilometers from their objective in Leningrad. As the infantry caught up with the armored divisions, it became clear that the Panzers needed much-needed rest and maintenance, while the entire strategic plan required a thorough re-evaluation. Compounding these challenges was the fact that Tallinn, the capital of Estonia, remained unconquered. This not only represented a significant strategic vulnerability but also a potential threat to the rear of Army Group North's advance. Furthermore, the Finnish forces, who were initially expected to help secure a link-up with German troops around Leningrad, were slowing their advance. As Colonel-General Erich Hoepner, wrote to his wife on 16 July of his dissatisfaction with the halted drive on Leningrad: ‘The deciding cause remains our weakness . . . The number of divisions is as inadequate as their equipment. . . . The men are tired, the losses increase, the fallout rate of vehicles rises.’

This hesitation complicated future plans for coordinated operations and allowed the Red Army to regroup and fortify its defenses. In fact, the threat of a complete collapse in the North was beginning to recede. The Northwestern Front was desperately working to reinforce the defenses of Leningrad. They were effectively utilizing the time gained from General Nikolai Vatutin's assault at Soltsy, continuing to funnel significant reserves into the region. However, this influx of troops was hampered by the emergency transfer of four rifle divisions to the Northern Front, which needed bolstering to defend the key area between Lake Ladoga to the southwest and Lake Onega further to the northwest. This region was experiencing the highest concentration of Finnish forces, and the Red Army was stretched thin as it sought soldiers to contain the enemy’s advances. Amid these pressing challenges, the Stavka the Soviet high command sent an inspection team to assess the Luga defenses, concluding that they were wholly inadequate for the imminent threat of attack. Consequently, the Northern Front was tasked with reinforcing these critical defensive positions, but this was no simple undertaking. While command of the defense construction in the region was unified to streamline efforts, the Stavka intervened regularly, signaling the importance of maintaining a robust defensive line. Disagreements regarding the optimal location and depth of these fortifications often led to inefficiencies; however, overall progress was being made. With each passing day, the stakes heightened as the forces clashed not only with the enemy but also grappled with the harsh realities of war, adaptability, and the urgent need for logistical support and strategic foresight.

In the second week of July 1941, the Stavka, issued critical orders for the reorganization of the Red Army’s field forces and chain of command. By the third week of July, these orders were finally being implemented, leading to significant changes across the board. The last of the Red Army’s Mechanized Corps were disbanded, and in a sweeping reform, all corps headquarters were dissolved. The new structure established a direct control model in which field armies were given direct oversight of their divisions, resulting in a streamlined organization that reduced the overall number of divisions per army to only five or six. Previously, some armies had managed as many as nine divisions, a situation that had become unsustainable in the face of the war's escalating demands. These changes were not arbitrary; they were crafted in response to two critical realities on the Eastern Front. The first was the glaring inadequacy of the Red Army's command and control capabilities. This deficiency stemmed from several issues, including outdated communication technologies available to commanders, incomplete or nonexistent reconnaissance efforts, and the lack of experience among many of its officers. A considerable number of poorly trained and inexperienced individuals occupied senior positions, hampering effective leadership. Although there were improvements underway, the reality remained that command is a nuanced skill that requires time and experience to master, a luxury that was dwindling as promising officers and men were lost in the relentless battles across the front.

The second important factor prompting this organizational shake-up was the necessity for field armies to become more agile. As the German Panzer Corps demonstrated their capacity for rapid movement and swift tactical shifts, it became clear that the Soviets needed to adapt to this new kind of warfare. While this agility related to the previously mentioned command issues, it also represented a separate understanding of the evolving battlefield dynamics. From the dawn of organized warfare, armies have grappled with finding the right balance between mass and maneuverability. Each war brings its own set of conditions that can shift that balance dramatically. The Red Army's efforts to reorganize in response to these emerging challenges underscored the reality that adaptability was vital for survival. Importantly, the Germans themselves had restructured their own forces prior to the onset of Operation Barbarossa, demonstrating their own acute awareness of the Eastern Front's complexities. By the end of the war, they too would undergo additional reorganizations in response to changing circumstances. Changes of this magnitude do not indicate incompetence; quite the opposite. Such reorganizations signal that a military leadership is actively trying to adapt to the front-line conditions, aiming to maximize the potential capabilities of its field forces amidst the chaos of war.

Army Group Center remained focused on the critical battle for Smolensk, a city that had fallen into German hands but whose encirclement had not yet been fully secured. General Heinz Guderian was tasked with closing the pocket on the southeastern side of the encirclement, but he had failed to execute this order in the previous week. Instead, he opted to push his forces further east, capturing the town of Yelna on July 20. Yelna was key to Guderian’s plans because it was a significant crossing across the Desna River. He evidently believed that he could get a jump on the Red Army by securing his next river crossing before the Soviets could stop him. This decision would have significant consequences. Before Guderian could maneuver his 17th Panzer Division across the breach to link up with the units commanded by General Hermann Hoth, nearly 40,000 encircled Red Army soldiers managed to escape the pocket. While they succeeded in fleeing, they emerged with only a few scattered pieces of armor, equipment, and artillery, reflecting the dire situation of the Western Front, which lay in shambles. In the aftermath of this defeat, the Stavka and General Georgy Timoshenko maintained a steadier composure than General Andrei Pavlov had demonstrated earlier in June. Positioned between Moscow and Smolensk, the Reserve Front was in place, though it was far from fully prepared for an all-out assault. Nonetheless, Timoshenko was allocated fresh units to pursue the retaking of Smolensk. To bolster his forces, the Reserve Front was effectively stripped of its strength, with four field armies, the 24th, 28th, 29th, and 30th, placed under his command.

These newly reinforced armies launched their attack on German positions on July 21, marking a critical moment in the struggle for Smolensk. Compared to earlier assaults on the western defensive line, efforts to coordinate these new attacks were intensified; however, they still encountered significant challenges in collaboration. Nonetheless, Army Group Center was caught off guard by the ferocity of the Soviet counterattacks. The Soviets were able to muster vast new reserves of manpower and matériel just as the Wehrmacht had begun to conclude that the Red Army was nearing its breaking point. This revelation, that the Red Army still possessed significant fighting spirit, was unsettling for many German officers and soldiers alike. At the forefront of this renewed Soviet effort was General Konstantin Rokossovsky, positioned at the core of Timoshenko’s newly established line. For the initial days of the counteroffensive, he focused on halting the advance of the 7th Panzer Division at Yartsevo. Despite relentless attacks from the Luftwaffe, which worked to punish his men for their resilience, Rokossovsky’s forces held their ground. Finally, on July 24, he was able to shift from a defensive posture to the offensive. While these Soviet attacks did not manage to break through the lines of Army Group Center, they inflicted significant casualties and disrupted German operations, effectively blooding their nose.

As the week drew to a close, the fighting continued to rage in the Smolensk region, yet it became increasingly evident that the Red Army would not be able to reclaim the city. General Heinz Guderian had successfully sealed the encirclement pocket and captured Yelna, but this victory proved to create more problems than it solved. The success resulted in a bulge in the German lines, exacerbated by the Wehrmacht's inability to advance further into Ukraine. This left the entire southern flank of Army Group Center exposed, particularly to the east of the Pripyat Marshes, a vast and treacherous lowland region that presented significant challenges for military movement. Despite the situation, the Red Army held firm along the line from Chernihiv to Roslav, maintaining a focused and significant resistance. Even after encircling three Soviet armies in front of Smolensk, the resilience of the Red Army weighed heavily on Adolf Hitler’s mind as he sought decisive victories. In the final days of July, Yelna continued to attract serious attention from Soviet forces. On July 25, Soviet tanks launched a bold offensive, breaking through the defenses of the 10th Panzer Division and the elite SS Regiment Grossdeutschland that were tasked with holding the area around Yelna. Only after intense fighting were the Soviet tanks pushed back, largely due to poor tactical control and coordination among Soviet officers. The attackers had failed to integrate infantry units into their armored assault, leaving them vulnerable to the Wehrmacht’s superior combined arms approach.

Later that same day, General Kurt von Schleicher’s 4th Army attempted to dispatch an infantry regiment to relieve the besieged Panzers at Yelna. However, during their movement, Regiment 485 was ambushed by the Soviet 149th Rifle Division, which was attacking from within the Smolensk pocket. The German infantry found themselves caught off guard, and within hours, two of their battalions were encircled by the relentless Soviet assault. They sent a desperate request for support, but this was denied, leaving them to fend for themselves. The situation became increasingly dire at the frontlines of Army Group Center, with the realization that there simply weren't enough men to reinforce positions or mount an effective counter-offensive. The reserves of the 4th Army had been stretched thin, leaving the battalions with no choice but to fight their way out of encirclement. This grueling effort took two full days, but finally, on July 27, they managed to retreat back to German lines. In the coming weeks, it became abundantly clear that Guderian’s bridgehead at Yelna would weigh heavily on Army Group Center, proving to be a millstone that would complicate their efforts and drag down their momentum as they sought to advance further into Soviet territory.

The fighting in Ukraine remained fiercely concentrated around the developing encirclement at Uman. On July 21, the Soviets launched a significant armored strike at Monastryche, igniting intense combat that continued throughout the following week. The 2nd and 24th Mechanized Corps of the Red Army put forth a commendable effort, engaging with the formidable forces of the 11th and 16th Panzer Divisions, in addition to the elite SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler. This clash represented a critical confrontation in the broader context of the Eastern Front, as Soviet forces sought to disrupt the German encirclement and reclaim lost ground. Despite facing heavily armored opponents, the Soviet mechanized units demonstrated resilience and tactical acumen, but the outcome of this struggle would ultimately hinge on the larger strategies at play in the region. This division would later be re-designated as the 1st SS Panzer Division, though it retained its longer name, often abbreviated as LSSAH. At this point in the war, there were only a few division-sized SS units, and they were predominantly known by names rather than formal numerical designations. The military growth of the SS, particularly in its Waffen-SS form, warrants a more extensive discussion that cannot be fully addressed here. However, it is important to highlight that the Waffen-SS, as the military arm of the SS, was never truly considered elite in a military sense. These units did not receive any specialized training and were generally equipped to the same standards as their Wehrmacht counterparts. What set them apart was their perceived political reliability, as the members met the Nazi regime's racial criteria, which had no correlation to their military skill or potential. Throughout the conflict, SS divisions were notorious for committing war crimes at rates that far exceeded those of regular Wehrmacht units.

The 9th Panzer Division to the north had previously launched a decisive attack against the 16th and 24th Mechanized Corps as they were retreating. Despite this pressure, the Soviets managed to maintain their composure and hold their lines. However, this did not mean the 9th Panzer was being stalled; quite the opposite. The capture of the small, rural town of Novoarkhanhelsk, located east of Uman, signified that the encirclement was closing from the north and east. As fighting at Monastryche came to an end, the SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (LSSAH) moved in to help secure the town against a weak counterattack from the remnants of the 4th Mechanized Corps. While the Panzers were managing the northern and eastern flanks of the encirclement, the 17th Army advanced from the west and south. By the end of the week, the encirclement of the 6th and 12th Soviet Armies had been successfully completed. While the process of liquidation would take longer, it was clear that another German victory had been secured: five mechanized corps and two Soviet armies had been all but destroyed, with the last of the Soviet armor on this side of the Dnieper eliminated. The Southwestern and Southern Fronts had suffered catastrophic losses, totaling around two hundred thousand men. This was yet another immense disaster that deserved mention alongside the encirclements at Minsk, Smolensk, and Kyiv, marking it as one of the great encirclement battles of 1941. Strategically, the prospects for the Soviets to hold back Army Group South east of Kyiv were bleak. Although there remained clean-up operations to conduct before launching an assault on Ukraine’s capital, both sides recognized it was only a matter of time before Army Group South would make another attempt to capture the city.

So far, the Eastern Front could only be described as a shocking defeat for the Red Army. In the first five weeks of the war, the Soviet Union had lost hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of territory. The three most critical cities, Leningrad, Kyiv, and Moscow, were now perilously close to the advancing German forces. Kyiv was within striking distance of the Panzers, while the Germans measured their distance to Leningrad in dozens of kilometers rather than hundreds. Moscow lay just three hundred and fifty kilometers away from some points on the front. The battles of Uman, Smolensk, and Minsk had been complete disasters, resulting in millions of casualties across various categories. Some of the best equipment and most capable units of the Red Army had been thrown into battle and squandered. Desperate defensive actions seemed to only delay the inevitable, as the Wehrmacht continued its relentless advance eastward. Throughout this tumult, many officers had proven incompetent, leading to the loss of tens of thousands of lives due to their ignorance of the most fundamental tenets of tactical maneuvering. Yet, not all hope was lost. The soldiers of the Red Army displayed remarkable bravery in the face of overwhelming odds. Contrary to Hitler’s predictions, the Soviet state was proving to be resilient, refusing to collapse when the Wehrmacht had kicked in the door. Instead, it had raised a dozen new armies, negotiated treaties with Hitler’s enemies, and steeled itself for a prolonged struggle. While conditions were dire and likely to worsen, Stalin’s government surpassed global expectations. The people of the Soviet Union demonstrated their willingness to fight to defend their nation.

By the end of July, no one was under the illusion that the situation for the Red Army was turning around. However, there remained a flicker of hope for victory, as a path forward to at least halt the advance of the Wehrmacht began to form. For Hitler, the war was developing in the opposite direction. Few leaders within the Wehrmacht or the Nazi regime were insightful enough to recognize it, and many feared the impending realization. At every turn, the Wehrmacht had concluded battles with indisputable victories. The Panzers had driven deep into the heart of the Soviet Union, crushing all opposition and facilitating some of the most one-sided battles in modern military history. Yet, a shadow was creeping in around the edges of their success. As July came to a close, the Wehrmacht’s total casualties in the east approached one hundred seventy-five thousand men, while only forty-seven thousand replacement soldiers had been dispatched to the front. The Panzers were now over seven hundred kilometers away from the easternmost railheads, leading to long delays in resupply, increased wear and tear on the supply trucks, and a steady decline in the combat effectiveness of forward units. Tanks that lacked spare parts had to be abandoned, leaving a burdensome concern for the immediate strength of fighting units, unaffected by the prospect of future resupply. The Panzer divisions were the essential component of Hitler’s military strategy. Without them, the victories of June and July would not have been possible. As the end of July approached, he and his generals were forced to confront the unsettling possibility that they might not have the strength needed to finish the job.

I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me.

Despite initial victories, the Wehrmacht underestimated Soviet tenacity. Intense battles raged around Smolensk, where German troops encircled the city, only to be met with fierce Soviet counterattacks led by General Timoshenko. The Red Army adapted with strategic reforms and relocated factories to sustain production. Though Smolensk fell, Germany's momentum began to falter. The harsh realities of warfare and evolving tactics suggested a critical turning point, hinting at future challenges for the Wehrmacht in their relentless campaign across the Eastern Front.